Recently in Noteworthy Developments & Decisions Category

Our firm has received more than a few calls from prospective clients who suffered injury as a consequence of the recent and unprecedented snowfall that hit our region. We anticipated these calls and the lawyers at the firm continue to assess our ability to prevail in cases involving slips and falls on ice and snow, and motor vehicle accidents caused by the slick conditions or other naturally created or man made hazards.

Maryland law requires property owners and motor vehicle operators to act with "due diligence and care" in protecting others from harm. The question we have not had to confront in many years is what the standard of "diligence" encompasses when weather conditions are such that even a person's best efforts are not good enough to prevent harm.

We all can agree that the amount of precipitation in the area was such that even our state and local governments were overwhelmed with the burden of remediating the conditions. In Baltimore City, for example, it took more than a week for the City to open all secondary roads. For nearly two weeks, parking lanes and sidewalks were barely passable.

Reasonable care is dependant on the circumstances presented to those whose conduct is being judged. We believe in many instances that although injury may have occurred, due care would not have changed the conditions existing at the time. We encourage those injured as a result of the weather conditions and potential negligence to contact our office. We will consider all cases on the facts and will honestly and candidly offer our advice to help guide and counsel those suffering personal injury due to the recent storms.

            An issue that presents itself frequently in personal injury-related motor vehicle accident cases is the coordination of insurance benefits to pay for medical treatment and outstanding medical bills.  Many individuals carry Personal Injury Protection insurance as part of their auto insurance coverage. "PIP insurance" as it is known in the industry, affords the insured a certain limited amount of "no fault" benefits (typically $2,500) to pay medical expenses and/or lost wages incurred as a result of the accident.  The coverage is "no-fault" because it is available whether or not the insured caused the accident.  It is also "no-fault" because payment of PIP benefits has no negative impact on the insured's policy premiums, insurability or renewability.  

Yesterday, the Court of Appeals of Maryland rendered a decision of first impression in the case of MAMSI Life & Health Insurance Co. v. Wu.  In that case, the Court clarified that a patient, when presenting for medical treatment, must exhaust their PIP benefits before their health insurer is obligated to provide coverage for medical treatment.  Before this decision was rendered, there was debate in the legal, medical and insurance communities as to whether either a medical provider or an insurance company could, absent consent of the insured, "coordinate" the insured's insurance benefits so as to make the PIP primary and health insurance secondary.  The Court ruled that under the specific statute providing for PIP benefits, an insurer may elect to coordinate the benefits in such a way as to require exhaustion of all PIP benefits before a health insurer becomes obligated to begin paying medical bills and that consent of the insured is not required.

The attorneys at Belsky, Weinberg & Horowitz, LLC, handle a vast array of motor vehicle related personal injury cases.  In some instances, use of one's health insurance to pay for accident-related medical treatment has various benefits that should be evaluated at the initial consultation.  In many instances, a health insurer will have a right of subrogation against the proceeds of recovery in a personal injury case, which means they must be paid back what they advanced for medical care caused by the negligence of another.  In some instances, that subrogation interest may become an actual lien against the proceeds of recovery but can frequently be reduced through negotiations by up to one-third or more.  Our attorneys and staff frequently are successful at negotiating reductions of health insurance subrogation claims and liens.  We consider this a service to our clients and a critical part of our legal representation.  Should you wish to consult with an attorney about your personal injury case, please contact our office.

About this Archive

This page is an archive of recent entries in the Noteworthy Developments & Decisions category.

Newsworthy Events is the previous category.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.