Recently in Auto Accident Law & Procedure Category

After the massive snow storms of recent days, many have experienced the flying snow and ice scenario, where a car or truck is driving at high speeds with piles of snow and ice on their vehicles. Although some may believe that bad weather provides them with some sort of "natural" immunity for failing to take the time required to remove the snow from their vehicles and that nature will simply takes its course, the opposite is actually true. Should an operator fail to remove snow and ice that ultimately flies from their vehicle into another, and particularly if that flying debris causes property damage or an accident, the driver of the vehicle can and should be held liable for negligence in failing to take action to remove all snow and ice that could project into another vehicle.

Some states, like Pennsylvania, have state laws that require complete snow removal from vehicles before they are operated. In Maryland, no such state law is on the books. The common law of negligence, however, dictates that a driver who fails to take appropriate action to remove obvious snow and ice from their vehicles will be held accountable for damage and injuries should the debris dislodge. This concept is akin to operating a vehicle with a known mechanical defect that results in an accident. Drivers should take the time and make the effort to remove all snow and ice from their vehicles. Otherwise, they can and should expect a claim against their insurance policy. Severe accidents and injuries from flying snow and ice debris are reported daily. Drivers are on notice by virtue of their own driving experience and common sense that the operation of a vehicle under such conditions is a danger to other motorists on the highways.

The lawyers at Belsky, Weinberg & Horowitz have successfully represented victims of accidents caused by flying snow and ice debris. In the event of such an incident, be sure to control your vehicle first, and then take note of as much information as possible about the at-fault vehicle. Should you be unable to get sufficient identifying information about that vehicle, report the incident immediately to the police and your insurance company, who will likely establish an uninsured motorist claim on your behalf. Such a claim will protect your rights and afford you compensation for property damage and personal injury, and will have no adverse impact on your insurance rates, renewal, or your general insurability. Please consult with a lawyer right away, particularly if you have suffered personal injury. We are available, free of charge, to discuss your case.

Auto accident claims nearly always involve property damage repair or reimbursment.  What many don't know is that, depending on the severity of the damage done, the accident may result in a diminished value of the vehicle at resale.  The laws of diminished value are everychanging, but the attorneys at Belsky, Weinberg and Horowitz have fought for our clients' entitlement to reimbursement for diminished value of their repaired motor vehicle. This is a legitimate but not oft fought for aspect of property damage.  If you believe your vehicle's value is diminished by virtue of a collision, our first advice is not to accept any payment for property repairs until the diminished value claim is preserved.

If you've been in an accident where your property damage and bodily injury claims are not yet settled, call us before it's too late.  We are here to help you with your case.  Call us anytime to speak with one of our attorneys.

RESOLVING YOUR PERSONAL INJURY CLAIM THROUGH BINDING ARBITRATION

| No Comments
The use of "binding arbitration" can be a useful way to resolve a personal injury case for accident victims.  Often times, liability (who is at fault) is not at issue in a case, but the amount of compensation for the injures suffered by the victim cannot be agreed upon.  The usual course of action in such a case is to file a lawsuit and let a jury decide the amount of damages to award.  This method can be time consuming and expensive, depending on the case.  An alternative to having a jury trial is to submit the case to binding arbitration.  The arbitrator, which is selected and agreed to by the parties, is often an experienced retired judge in the same county or jurisdiction as the court where the case would be tried.  The arbitrator has extensive experience in the type of case presented to him or her, and understands the issues presented and the value of the claim.  Many times, the parties agree upon a "high-low" amount.  This means that no matter what amount of money the arbitrator awards, the actual amount paid by the defenant cannot be lower or higher than the preset amounts.  For example, imagine the "high" amount agreed to is $100,000.00 and the "low" is $20,000.00.  After hearing the evidence presented in the case, the arbitrator awards $125,000.00.  Because the parties agreed that the high amount was $100,000.00, the most the defendant will pay is the $100,000.00.  On the other end of the spectrum, if the arbitrator awarded nothing, the plaintiff would still get $20,000.00.  The parties agree prior to arbitration that whatever the decision of the arbitrator is, it is the final decision and no appeal can be taken.  The arbitration process is generally quicker and more streamlined, and costs can be contained more easily than if the case went to trial.  The advantages for plaintiffs include resolving the case quickly and ensuring that no matter what the decision, he or she will not walk away with nothing.
 
The attorneys at Belsky, Weinberg & Horowitz have many years of experience handling personal injury claims.  If you have suffered injury because of someone else's negligence call us at 410-234-0100 or email us at legalteam.net.  We offer a free consultation, and no expenses unless we recover compensation for you.

Maryland law requires every motorist to carry "uninsured motorist" (UM) coverage as part of their vehicle insurance coverage.  This required coverage is designed to protect an injured motorist (whether bodily injury, property damage or both) from two all too frequent scenarios.  First, it provides coverage when the at fault vehicle has no insurance coverage at all.  Second, it provides "gap" coverage where the at fault driver has too little insurance to pay the full value of the claim.  Indeed, despite the law, there are drivers who continue to operate vehicles illegally without insurance.  In those instances, the claim would be submitted to the victim's UM carrier for payment.  A UM claim is no-fault in that a claim against the policy will not affect insurabilty, renewability or rates. 

A typical example where UM benefits are needed is where serious injuries have been sustained by one or more individuals in a vehicle struck by another who is deemed at fault.  Under Maryland law, the person (non-business) must carry a minimum of $20,000 of coverage for the bodily injury of one victim and a total of $40,000 to cover the bodily injury of all victims involved in a single accident.  Although this amount may seem significant, it is actually very scant coverage which oridinarily falls well below what is required to pay the claims in full.  When a shortage of coverage arises, the UM coverage may be tapped to provide additional coverage provided the UM limits of the victims' policies exceed the limits of the at fault driver's policy.  So, if one who is injured has a $50,000 per person UM limit, and the at fault driver has a $20,000 per person limit, the victim may claim the difference between the at fault's policy and their own as additional coverage.  In the example, that amount would be an extra $30,000.

UM claims can be very tricky and complicated due to issues surrounding the proper method for making claim, settling claims with more than one insurance company, and determining when the applicable statute of limitations begins to run.  If you find yourself involved in an accident involving an uninsured or underinsured driver, please contact our attorneys who will be happy to explain your rights to all appropriate benefits and coverage.

 

DETERMINING THE VALUE OF YOUR AUTO ACCIDENT CLAIM

| No Comments

Our clients frequently ask us what they can expect to receive, in either a settlement or at trial, as compensation injuries sustained in an auto accident. This can be a very difficult question to answer, as each case is different. However, an experienced attorney is able to determine a range of compensation, based on a number of factors.

Your attorney will examine the specific facts of your case, including: the nature and severity of your injuries, your medical records, how easily or difficult it will be to prove liability (fault), the connection between your injuries and the accident, the witnesses' statements regarding the accident itself; the extent of insurance coverage and where the accident occurred as well as where the other driver resides. All of these factors are extremely important and must be taken into account when determining whether or not to accept an offer. The insurance company takes all of the same factors into account when deciding how much money to offer on the claim. These days, many insurance companies use computer programs to decide the offer. The adjuster inputs all of the information about you, about where the accident occurred and the type of injury you suffered and the programs gives that adjuster a "range' of settlement amounts. The attorneys here at Belsky, Weinberg & Horowitz have many years of experience dealing with auto accident cases just like yours. The insurance companies know which attorneys settle all of their cases and which ones will go to bat for their clients in court. These companies know that our attorneys will not hesitate to reject their "low-ball" offers and file suit for their clients.

If a case cannot settle, and a lawsuit must be filed, it is important to decide whether to file suit in a District Court or in the Circuit Court. In the District Court, verdicts vary widely, depending on which judge decides the case and in which jurisdiction the case is being tried. The attorneys at Belsky, Weinberg & Horowitz understand this, and are very familiar with the judges in Maryland Courts. Experience allows us to predict, within a fairly narrow range, the amount of money a particular judge will award as compensation.

If the case will be tried by a jury, it is more difficult to predict. Jurors in certain areas are more generous than others. In general, jurors in our western counties, and on the eastern shore, are much more conservative and less likely to award large sums of money, than jurors in places such as Baltimore city and Prince George's County.

In most instances, you will be compensated for your medical bills and lost wages. The other part of compensation is for "pain and suffering." This award can vary widely, depending on the type of injury. This type of award is much more difficult to predict, especially when the jury, which is comprised of six individuals from the local community, is making the decision. As I discussed above, a juror in Cumberland is likely to award much less than a juror in Baltimore city.

It is important to retain a competent, experienced attorney after you have been in an automobile accident. The lawyers at Belsky, Weinberg & Horowitz will work to protect your interests and negotiate the best possible outcome for you.

About this Archive

This page is an archive of recent entries in the Auto Accident Law & Procedure category.

Interesting Cases Solved by BWH is the next category.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.