December 2009 Archives

Robert E. Cahill, Sr., retired Baltimore County Circuit Court judge, died on December 14th from a long standing illness.  He was 77.  Judge Cahill will be remembered as a no-nonsense trial judge with a great legal mind and lots of instinct and wit.  His obituary appears in the Baltimore Sun.

The lawyers at Belsky, Weinberg & Horowitz had the honor of trying a variety of cases before Judge Cahill.  We learned a great deal from his handling of trials, motions and courtroom procedures.  We knew he always expected a great deal of us as advocates for our clients and we hope we lived up to his expectations.  We learned a great deal from the judge and express our condolences to his family.

The head of the Maryland Attorney Grievance Commssion, Melvin Hirschman, will retire on June 30, 2010 after serving since 1981.  The Daily Record reported this breaking story earlier today.  Mr. Hirschman has led the commission, which investigates all complaints for attorney misconduct, since 1981.  The AGC was created only six years earlier, in 1975.  Attorneys who are publically sanctioned can be viewed at the Maryland Judiciary Web Site.

Belsky, Weinberg and Horowitz partner Alan J. Belsky serves as a Panel Member for the Attorney Grievance Commision and has sat on a number of peer review panels hearing various complaints of attorney misconduct.  Peer review is confidential unless public charges are brought.  Thereafter, the matter is referred to a Circuit Court judge for findings of fact and conclusions of law.  An appeal can then be taken directly to the Court of Appeals of Maryland.  Unfortunately, a fair number of reported opinions are issued every year by the Court of Appeals on issues involving attorney grievances.  Any reported opinion containing the AGC in the case name involves an attorney facing disciplinary action.

Auto accident claims nearly always involve property damage repair or reimbursment.  What many don't know is that, depending on the severity of the damage done, the accident may result in a diminished value of the vehicle at resale.  The laws of diminished value are everychanging, but the attorneys at Belsky, Weinberg and Horowitz have fought for our clients' entitlement to reimbursement for diminished value of their repaired motor vehicle. This is a legitimate but not oft fought for aspect of property damage.  If you believe your vehicle's value is diminished by virtue of a collision, our first advice is not to accept any payment for property repairs until the diminished value claim is preserved.

If you've been in an accident where your property damage and bodily injury claims are not yet settled, call us before it's too late.  We are here to help you with your case.  Call us anytime to speak with one of our attorneys.

RESOLVING YOUR PERSONAL INJURY CLAIM THROUGH BINDING ARBITRATION

| No Comments
The use of "binding arbitration" can be a useful way to resolve a personal injury case for accident victims.  Often times, liability (who is at fault) is not at issue in a case, but the amount of compensation for the injures suffered by the victim cannot be agreed upon.  The usual course of action in such a case is to file a lawsuit and let a jury decide the amount of damages to award.  This method can be time consuming and expensive, depending on the case.  An alternative to having a jury trial is to submit the case to binding arbitration.  The arbitrator, which is selected and agreed to by the parties, is often an experienced retired judge in the same county or jurisdiction as the court where the case would be tried.  The arbitrator has extensive experience in the type of case presented to him or her, and understands the issues presented and the value of the claim.  Many times, the parties agree upon a "high-low" amount.  This means that no matter what amount of money the arbitrator awards, the actual amount paid by the defenant cannot be lower or higher than the preset amounts.  For example, imagine the "high" amount agreed to is $100,000.00 and the "low" is $20,000.00.  After hearing the evidence presented in the case, the arbitrator awards $125,000.00.  Because the parties agreed that the high amount was $100,000.00, the most the defendant will pay is the $100,000.00.  On the other end of the spectrum, if the arbitrator awarded nothing, the plaintiff would still get $20,000.00.  The parties agree prior to arbitration that whatever the decision of the arbitrator is, it is the final decision and no appeal can be taken.  The arbitration process is generally quicker and more streamlined, and costs can be contained more easily than if the case went to trial.  The advantages for plaintiffs include resolving the case quickly and ensuring that no matter what the decision, he or she will not walk away with nothing.
 
The attorneys at Belsky, Weinberg & Horowitz have many years of experience handling personal injury claims.  If you have suffered injury because of someone else's negligence call us at 410-234-0100 or email us at legalteam.net.  We offer a free consultation, and no expenses unless we recover compensation for you.

About this Archive

This page is an archive of entries from December 2009 listed from newest to oldest.

November 2009 is the previous archive.

February 2010 is the next archive.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.